Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Tech and Social Interaction

The only ways that Technology influences social interaction are what we project onto it. Technology is a tool that cannot make decisions for us, rather, we make decisions on how to use this tool. So either we can choose to use it to further develop social interaction, or use it to confine ourselves; it is our choice. "If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?" this same line of thinking can be applied to technology and social interaction but is a double edged sword, 'does technology make us introverts or extroverts when is comes to social interaction?' it is up to the individual as to how one uses technology for social interaction. there are those who use it to reach out and connect with those that are elsewhere located. there are those that use it to test out a possibly new relationship before one decides if the person is worth spending time with. there are even those who use it to find dates in a world where their busy schedule doesn't permit extra time for random social interaction. and then there are those who hide behind technology because they are either: 1) afraid of real interaction with other people 2) want to pretend that they are someone else with people who don't know the difference 3) or to remove themselves from reality because they don't want to face real life. referring to point #2  my favorite quote ever "the one thing i hate the most is a pussy with a gun" if you get what I'm saying, the figurative gun is technology. the Internet makes you unknown, well fuck yeah it does, if you do not feel comfortable expressing your own opinion in front of people that know you, don't be a fucking bitch and hide behind a screen name, this sort of thing leads to people doubting themselves and as of recently, killing themselves.  to sum up, technology is only negative on social life of individuals if you are to lazy to do things for yourself. if you are willing to try and make a real social interaction out of a fake one (Internet) then it is positive. a relationship can never be meaningful unless you can physically be with the other party and feel comfortable around them. things like dating sites, craigslist and other sites that promote physical social interaction are viable ways of creating meaningful relationships as long as parties physically meet and can stand each other. message boards, online gaming, and virtual worlds are all one in the same; a place where individuals can act out their delusions an grandeur without social repercussion because they are 'just a screen name.' with the world as spread out as it is, social networking sites are almost needed to keep in touch with those we may only be able to get to know for a bit, but then can be used for setting up times to hang out when the two individuals are in proximity for a brief while. we can create places for people to meet others, but that is dependent on wok schedules, sports, school, etc. plus such places already exist, THEY ARE CALLED PARKS, MALLS, AND PLAZAS so there is no need for governments to waste more money on something that wont work.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with your statement that "a relationship can never be meaningful unless you can physically be with the other party and feel comfortable around them" and that "things like dating sites, craigslist and other sites that promote physical social interaction are viable ways of creating meaningful relationships as long as parties physically meet and can stand each other." I wrote a similar blog in which I expressed my personal conviction that technology serves to enhance and support real life relationships more than it serves to create new relationships. I have a hard time imagining people keeping a viable relationship when they have never experienced face to face communication. I learned about mediated communication in my communication class and one of the primary differences presented between these two types of communication is the "richness" present in face to face communication. Richness refers to the availability of nonverbal cues that supplement the message of the communication. Mediated communication, on the other hand, such as email and texting, do not contain these additional nonverbal cues. As a result, mediated communication is often very dry and direct. All in all, I think that the "richness" in face to face communication makes it the best type of communication to maintain a great relationship, whereas mediated communication is a good way to maintain that already existing relationship during times of distance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh and I forgot to add - some of the nonverbal aspects of communication include things like facial expressions and tone of voice - the types of cues that email and texting do not necessarily convey.

    ReplyDelete